This is one of the more interesting papers I have read. It shows how with all the digital media and entertainment available, people are becoming increasingly bored in the modern age.

It discusses how digital media is an ineffective coping strategy for boredom.

For most of human history, creativity was not self-motivated. Art and music emerged as responses to shared environments. People lived close together and moments of quiet or emotion naturally invited song, drawing, rhythm, or story. Creativity happened because the situation called for it.

Modern life removed those signals. We work indoors under artificial light, often alone, with no shared stopping points and no communal sense that “now is the time.” After removing the conditions that once made creativity automatic, we tell people that if they can’t draw, play music, or make things consistently, they lack motivation or discipline.

If making art or music feels hard when you’re alone at home, that doesn’t mean something is wrong with you. It means the conditions have changed. Motivation used to be environmental, not psychological. It arose from presence, rhythm, constraint, and shared attention. When those cues disappeared, effort had to replace response — and creating became more difficult.

The issue, then, is not individual capacity but environmental fit. Ancient human behaviors are being asked to function in settings that no longer support them. Seeing this clearly reframes the problem and shifts the focus towards understanding the kinds of environments in which creativity naturally emerges.

Sometimes I feel like I’ve stumbled across a secret that is true but that no one believes. Running barefoot on grass is a great way to train and has continued to work for me over the years.

There is a massive running/shoe industry out there, and most everyone buys into it. Expensive shoes, training plans, races, injury rehab, etc. It’s like a maze with no exit.

Instead, I go out to a field and run barefoot on grass 2 - 3x per week. I run at an easy pace for the most part, but add in some sprints and other paces. That’s it.

This “system” has worked for me for many years. I wake up and feel fine. No injuries or issues. I’m 54, and running continues to be enjoyable.

Maybe if you’re stuck or the typical running programs aren’t working for you - give barefoot running on grass a try. Drop me a line if you want to explore it (see About page).

Usually in the winter, I run with minimal shoes, but this winter I’m trying a different approach. I try to find days and times when the weather is warm enough to continue running barefoot on grass.

I’ve found that running in the low 40s is doable, but the 30s - not so much. So I try to run on certain days and usually in the late afternoon when the temperature is the highest.

I was running yesterday at the field and some kids at the playground saw me. “Hey, he’s running with no shoes on!” Yes, indeed. And it feels good.

A good amount of running advice says to run at 180 steps per minute, as that is what elite runners typically run at.

I have experimented with this pace over the years, but only occassionally.

However, I have noticed it’s a bit more useful with age. Your reaction time slows with age. So sometimes on a run, I will time myself to run at 180 steps per minute. It seems to make my running more fluid, and so I’ll do it for a few minutes or so to get a better feel for things.

Therefore, I’d say it’s a good tool to use, but it’s probably not something that you need to rigorously adhere to.

Here’s a good video on running technique by Steve Magness.

And a different perspective by Matt Fitzgerald.

Social media is distorting people’s view of the aging process. It takes a small sliver of older adults who are fit and broadcasts their success. It makes it seem like the norm when it is not.

Diet and exercise is not all there is to aging. Other components are genetics and plain luck. Somehow those latter two rarely get mentioned.

Here’s an interesting thought experiment: these fit, older people - notice there is no social media attention when they die. About 150,000 people die every day, and some portion of those people must be fit. Yet I never read anything about fit people dying. It makes it seem like it isn’t happening (that these fit people are somehow avoiding death), yet obviously in reality it is.

Another way to say it: the algorithm only cares about you if you are fit and performing for the camera. If you die, oh well, the algorithm will just find another older fit person to take your place. You simply get erased.

I think this is a terrible way to view aging. Aging involves decay and loss of capability. People deserve compassion during this process. Real aging doesn’t make for good tv, but it is an inevitable part of life.

I read lots of proclamations online that if you don’t lift weights as you age, you will become frail, get dementia, etc. All of that is bullshit.

It’s more correct to say that some type of muscular exertion is necessary as you age, but it does not have to be weight training. There are many examples of people staying in shape through different paths.

What happens is that someone who has a propensity for lifting weights does that as they age and gets good results. And then they assume that because it worked for them, it will work for others. That is not the case.

We all have different abilities and preferences. For example, it’s been quite hot the last week when I’ve been running. But if you give me a choice - would I rather go run outside in 95 degrees or lift weights in an air-conditioned gym - it’s not even close. I’ll be out running.

But I’m aware others have different preferences. And that’s how it goes as you age - you have to follow your own physical inclinations and do what you enjoy.

I see much more writing about the dangers of screen time and phones, but very little change in actual behavior. At some point, awareness of a problem is not enough - action is needed.

Going outside into green space is a first step. Just a few minutes can reset your perspective.

See you out there.

I think one of the more subtle aspects of running is upper body posture. In her wonderful book, 8 Steps to a Pain-Free Back, Esther Gokhale discusses the concept of the inner corset.

The inner corset consists of the abdominal muscles that keep the back from arching too much. In running, there can be a tendency for the back to arch and the bottom of the rib cage to flare out.

When running, if the back arches too much then the weight of the head gets behind the hips. This slows things down and makes running less efficient.

With the inner corset engaged, the upper body is more vertical in posture and that makes for more efficient running.